Evolv & Schools: What You Need to Know

Unless and until the epidemic of gun violence in schools begins to subside, schools will continue to look at better ways to keep their community safe so the focus can remain on education and the social and emotional wellness of students, faculty, and staff. As a result of the rise in violence, educators and school administrators are now being required to “get schooled” on the very important business of keeping people safe, a highly advanced skillset of subject matter experts from the Department of Defense, TSA, FBI, and Secret Service, in addition to security professionals keeping major venues safe across the nation.  

Knowing that to mitigate risk, every second counts, as does the technology, people, and processes in a layered security approach, one solution school districts are considering is weapons screening. This is a new approach to security for schools. It is not the only answer by any means, but rather, one innovation allowing schools to increase their security posture without creating a prison-like experience. New technology, including weapons detection, access control, video management systems, and social media monitoring, are important tools, but are not foolproof. Technology is an effective part of a safety plan for schools; but that plan must include better social and emotional support for students at risk, a connected and engaged school community and education, and action around safe and responsible gun ownership.   

While traditional metal detectors have been around for more than a century, advanced weapons detection systems, such as Evolv Express®, are a completely new experience for most schools deploying them. As a result, they require administration, educators, parents, students, and school security personnel to develop and learn new protocols and become familiar with new technology.  

Naturally, innovative technologies are often misunderstood. That’s why we wanted to address some topics about how Evolv Express, the system that is helping to make the world’s leading sports stadiums, concert venues and theme parks safer, works for schools. With hundreds of schools around the country having incorporated Evolv Express into their safety plan, here are some important things to understand about the technology, how it works, and our corporate commitment to customers’ safety.  

What we share with the public and what we don’t  

Let’s start with the concept of transparency in marketing weapons detection technology.  It is well understood in the security industry that sharing details of a security system or operation puts people at risk.   

It is important to understand that Evolv Express systems are designed to detect various types of weapons, and components of weapons, that could cause mass harm, not items that are readily available within schools. There is no perfect solution that will stop 100% of threats, including ours, which is why security must include a layered approach that involves people, process, and technology.  

The best technology is transparent as to what it does without disclosing a “blueprint” to a bad actor that could use it to do harm. Those in charge of keeping buildings safe must assume that bad actors are always looking for ways to circumvent the security processes in place. It is devastating that this concept even applies to schools, but it must.  

This is a best practice well known in the security industry, notably the TSA. The TSA carefully guards Sensitive Security Information (SSI) to keep the public safe. SSI is information that, if publicly released, would be detrimental to transportation security, as defined by Federal Regulation 49 C.F.R. Part 1520. 

As John Pistole, former director of the FBI and TSA has explained, “we saw this in the real world on Christmas day 2009, when Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula sent Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab from Brussels to Detroit with a non-metallic IED hidden in his underwear. They knew in advance that there was no detection for non-metallic bombs in most airport security protocols and regimens in use at the time. We know that they discovered this vulnerability through extensive online research. We also know that they conducted multiple scouting missions to probe and test for vulnerabilities at specific facilities using specific screening methods.” 

Marketing weapons detection security requires a delicate balance between educating stakeholders on new technology and not providing bad actors with the information they could use to do harm. So, while public-facing marketing materials are intentionally not specific, we communicate all aspects of the Evolv Express system – including limitations and capabilities – with the trusted security professionals at our customers, partners, and prospects. We believe there should be nothing schools deciding to deploy Evolv Express don’t know about the technology before making the decision to include our systems as part of their security approach. That’s why our team works tirelessly to make sure they have all information necessary to determine if Express is the right weapons screening system for them.  

This is not “deceptive marketing” or “security through obscurity” as those not in the weapons detection industry might declare, but rather, a critical and proven best practice of security professionals who have the profound responsibility of keeping the public safe from harm.    

Why schools are investing in AI-based weapons detection  

Customers making the decision to deploy Evolv Express do not do so lightly. They test our systems, conduct extensive research, speak directly with customers, assess the capabilities and limitations, and vet against other options before selecting the best solution for their district.   

Here is what we know: When it comes to security, schools are asking for ways to help make their buildings safer, reduce anxiety around gun violence, and speed up response time to threats.   

Evolv Express is the only artificial intelligence-based weapons detection system that pinpoints exactly where a threat is on the person while distinguishing most everyday items from weapons. The system looks at threats and where they are, not at people. This speeds up response time to an incident and reduces bias and the need for body searches which often leads to the friction and anxiety caused by traditional metal detectors and their newer alternatives. Unlike Evolv, those other technologies simply alert when a potential threat/object goes through the system, leaving the security guard to conduct an assessment (sometimes full-body) to find the location of the potential threat and “yoyo” the person through the system several times. (“Yoyo” refers to a common security term for having an alerted person run through security screening several times until they no longer alarm.)   

We continue to hear from our customers about the positive impact adding Express to their safety plan has had on their school.  And we work with schools to overcome obstacles new technology might present, such as identifying ways to account for certain Chromebooks which may alert due to specific components of their design resembling a part of a weapon.   

“Evolv is the best that is out there for schools,” noted Mark Laurrie, Niagara Falls City School District Superintendent. “With these systems in place, we’re confident that we’re fostering the highest quality learning environment and safety of our students and employees while investing in technology that continues to get better.”  

And Atlanta Public Schools police Chief Ronald Applin has said the Evolv system is more efficient and less invasive than previous screening that has been in place at least since 2016 when he joined the district. 

Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools (CMS), one of the largest districts in the country, has increased its deployment of the Evolv Express systems to nearly 70 schools after experiencing a year of success with its initial rollout. CMS  Chief Operations Officer Brian Schultz explained how adding Express to its security approach has enabled a safer environment that lets teachers and students focus on education and build relationships that support better academic outcomes.  

Again, there is no perfect solution that will create a completely sterile environment and catch all weapons for schools or any venue.  This is why a layered approach of people, process, and technology is used in security planning and execution – and schools are no different. Our systems are stopping guns regularly from entering buildings where they should not be. And AI-weapons detection working in concert with schools to create safer environments is more than just deterrence and detection. It’s about setting a positive tone for a school community at the beginning of each day. It’s about stopping the weapons from coming in, but also bringing peace of mind so that students, teachers, staff, parents, and caregivers know they are safer. It’s about school communities connecting with each other, checking on each other, and working together to stop violence.    

A final thought 

Our mission at Evolv is to help make the world a safer place. That mission is central to why I joined the company; I have a daughter who is a second-grade teacher in the Boston public school system. When she told me that on the third day of every school year, she teaches her 8-year-old students to hide under a desk from an active shooter, it demonstrated the significant emotional toll our children must endure in what should be a safe place for learning. I worry every day as a father, businessman, and human being about this tragic reality. When I hear of something bad happening at a school, I pray that my daughter and her kids are safe.  

Working hand-and-hand with this team each and every day, I know that all Evolv employees hold the responsibility of school safety as our highest priority. We are deeply committed to our mission and grateful to partner with schools to help keep our children and teachers safe.   

School Safety Part 3: Beyond Locks and Alarms – Balancing Mental Health with Physical Security

In this third installment of our Q&A series with Jill Lemond, Evolv’s director of education, we talk about social and emotional learning, mental health and gun violence, and the real impact of weapons detection screening systems in schools.

Prior to joining Evolv, Jill spent 12 years as the assistant superintendent of safety and school operations at Oxford Community Schools in Oxford, Michigan.

Q. What are the hidden costs of feeling unsafe in the classroom?

A. We know from study after study that the perception – and reality – of unsafe school environments directly correlates with lower learning outcomes. When students feel safe at school, they are better able to focus on learning and have stronger academic outcomes. Likewise, teachers and staff cannot be as effective in their imperative roles if they do not feel safe.

Q. How does social and emotional health factor into school safety planning?

A. Social and emotional health is significant when it comes to school safety planning. We are amidst a post-pandemic mental health crisis in the United States and it is particularly impacting our youth. I encourage schools to take a closer look at the increased number of counseling referrals, students self-reporting anxiety and depression, and the rise in suicides and suicidal ideation in their own school communities. When they do this, they’ll find that the data speaks volumes. Now consider the rising number of counseling referrals, along with an increase in school shootings and a growing need for more teachers and mental health professionals, and you’ll see how it sets the stage for more tragedies. I don’t think it’s possible to look at the numbers and not see the connection between troubled students and school shootings.

As school administrators explore the numbers behind the counseling referrals, they should also try to get to the root cause of mental health concerns and factor in social and emotional well-being into the school’s strategic safety plans. While schools are doing what they can to help students, keeping up with the demand is proving to be more than challenging, especially as we see long-term impacts of COVID-19 on student development and learning.

Q. Can you comment on the rise in swatting – hoax emergency calls to the police reporting school shootings – and its impact on communities?

A. The rise in swatting is having a big impact. We know that over the past decade, the classroom has changed dramatically due to social media and students having phones. It’s now reached a point where it’s almost too easy to create mass havoc like swatting.

Today, the threat of violence and school shootings is ever-present as students and teachers are constantly thinking that at any moment they could go into a lockdown or have to quickly respond to an emergency. When there is a fake incident reported and their fears become a reality, it amplifies anxiety. As swatting increases throughout the country, fears and anxiety rise in schools and everybody in the building is on high alert. Once the report is proven false, is it really fair to expect that students and teachers will be able to focus on learning and teaching for the rest of the day?

To end swatting, we need to do a better job explaining its impact to students, letting them know how to anonymously report when they hear or see something, and communicating very clearly about increasingly tougher laws that are being put into place. Let’s not forget that swatting is illegal. I also think educational campaigns about swatting should include students; giving them a voice and asking for their help is likely to decrease the number of fake calls. There is nothing funny about instigating panic and trauma.

Q. What are your thoughts on communities raising concerns that installing weapons detection screening systems creates distractions for students?

A. The overall rise in school shootings across the country means students are already distracted by the potential threat of violence. Our children are aware of the gun violence epidemic in this country and, through technology, have greater access to information than any previous generation. Weapons detection screening systems do not create distractions. Instead, they actually have the opposite effect because they allow students to stop thinking about weapons once they’re in the building. I’ve personally heard from countless students that having a weapons detection screening system in school offers them peace of mind.

Q. How does the introduction of weapons detection screening impact students and teachers?

A. Overall, it has an enormously positive impact on students and staff. During the morning arrival, it creates an opportunity for staff and administrators to greet students and let them know how glad they are to see them at school. The new protocol improves safety along with boosting social and emotional learning by recognizing every student, especially those that may have previously felt left out or ignored. Also, since systems like Evolv Express® are not metal detectors, students do not have to break their stride or stand in long lines due to false alarms that lead to unnecessary bag checks. The benefit of using technology like Evolv is that it does the security work, allowing teachers and staff to focus on their strengths in connecting with every student while reminding them of how safe they are in the school environment.

Q. What are some best practices for introducing weapons detection screening systems into schools?

A. Everybody in education knows that we need to do everything we can to make school environments safe for learning. So when it comes to introducing weapons detection screening systems, it requires a community effort. As key stakeholders have more meaningful safety experiences at venues like stadiums and theaters, where weapons screening systems are prevalent, the introduction of those same systems in schools will be easier.

From the perspective of evaluating weapons detection screening systems, I encourage school districts, parents and other interested parties to comment throughout the process. I want to, especially and specifically, invite students into the evaluation process, as well. Ask difficult questions and raise concerns so they can be addressed at the earliest stages of the decision-making process.

Also, I think it’s important for schools to communicate that weapons detection screening systems are not a standalone answer to gun violence. They must be part of a larger emergency operations plan. That plan takes into account the perspectives of parents, students, teachers, staff, administrators and other key stakeholders. It also outlines what to do and who to contact in an emergency and prioritizes regular training and drills to ensure everybody in the building knows what to do in the event of an incident or the detection of a gun or other prohibited items.

Essentially, the #1 best practice for introducing weapons detection screening systems into schools is beginning with a strategic emergency operations plan that is an integrated, collaborative effort spanning the people, processes and technology responsible for school safety.

School Safety Part 2: A Layered Approach – Exploring the Pieces of the Puzzle

In the second installment of our series interviewing Jill Lemond, Evolv’s director of education, we discuss ways that schools can improve safety and security without having to invest tremendous financial resources. We also talk about the impact of technology to keep students safer, and how the school of the future may look as a result of the latest innovations. Prior to joining Evolv, Jill spent 12 years as the Assistant Superintendent of Safety and School Operations in Oxford Community Schools in Oxford, Michigan.

Q. When it comes to school safety planning, who should be involved?

A. The school safety team should include a multi-faceted group of stakeholders across elementary, middle and high schools, with representation from district administrators, principals, teachers, emergency responders, members of the local police and fire departments, and community members, such as coaches, that are directly involved with students, board members, and select parents. Also, student leaders should be involved based on their insight into the student body and knowledge of the buildings.

Once the team is assembled, you need to build meaningful connections with each member while ensuring everybody fully understands their role. For example, local first responders, police and fire should be invited to tour school buildings, given access to entrances, and provided maps with room numbers on them. It’s also important to designate a primary contact for communicating to parents, students and the community. School administrators need a dedicated point of contact within local law enforcement to ensure lawful and accurate communication in the event of a critical incident. When specific roles are mapped out in the planning process, it avoids unnecessary confusion and provides a more efficient approach to incident response.

Q. For schools with limited resources, what actions can they take to improve safety?

A. There are several free and low-cost actions schools can take to improve safety. They can start by regularly reviewing their emergency operations plan. Every school has one and it’s important to review them at least once a year, if not more frequently.

Another free resource for schools is the School Security Assessment Tool. The assessment module and related forms are available to complete and prompt meaningful discussions about safety. For example, the checklist asks important questions that may not immediately come to mind, such as whether there are boulders or other obstacles near the school that will prevent a car from entering. Active shooter drills are another free exercise that should be conducted on a regular basis. To prepare, schools can access one of the many free tools available online. As a reminder, the drills should be conducted in a way that is age appropriate and ensures everybody in the school—including substitute teachers, paraprofessionals, office staff, and food service personnel—knows what to do if an active shooter is in the classroom, hallway, cafeteria, or any other part of the building. There should also be a dedicated lead in every school district that is responsible for ensuring safety plans do not sit on the shelf and that training happens regularly.

While these are some of the free options available to schools, it really comes down to having a layered approach to school safety.

Q. What do you mean by having a layered approach to school safety?

A. A layered approach is one that looks at all facets of safety and recognizes that there’s no one single action you can take that will keep a school safe. Rather, it’s a series of small steps and big actions working together to protect everybody in the building. A layered approach combines people, training, technology, and the operational processes around each to ensure a cohesive plan for safety.

You can think about it in three tiers:

1. Prevention – The first is prevention and creating an atmosphere of safety through ongoing training, regular drills, taking advantage of the free resources available, and regularly refining safety plans. It can also include weapons detection screening solutions like Evolv Express®. The activities and plans put in place by the school should not be available to the general public. It also needs to include connecting with students and checking in regularly, especially those that may be overlooked or bullied.

2. Mitigation – The second tier is mitigation. The key stakeholders need to know how to identify and respond to threats. Those threats may be happening in person with physical weapons or verbally using threats of violence. They may also include online discussions that are overt threats. They may also be more subtle such as taking a closer look at the victim(s) of bullying.

3. Response & Communication – The third tier is all about response and communicating with students. It also factors in how to respond to parents, the community and other stakeholders in the event of an incident while taking steps to reduce future tragedies.

Q. As school gun violence continues to rise, school safety has become more complex. What have been the most impactful changes that you’ve seen over the course of your educational career?

A. I’d have to say the most impactful changes are the demand for improving school safety and the speed of technology innovation to do just that. The rise in school violence has reached epidemic proportions, and as a result, there has been a public outcry demanding we, as a society, do more and do better to protect our kids.

Along with continuously training and refining safety protocols and emergency operations plans, technology has made a significant difference. For example, schools are installing panic buttons in classrooms, using online tools like Gaggle to be alerted about potential threats and plans being discussed on social media, and setting up emergency messenger systems to instantly communicate an emergency throughout the building and to local law enforcement and first responders. All of these technology innovations make a difference in responding to incidents more quickly while also setting a tone for zero tolerance when it comes to school violence.

Q. How do you envision school safety changing in the next 3-5 years?

A. I think we’ll continue to see tech guiding safety response. Schools, and especially parents, will demand better ways to identify and address potential threats. As they see the increased use of non-threatening weapons screening systems like Evolv at public venues including stadiums, theaters and amusement parks, they’ll want the same safety and security measures in schools.

Also, as technology continues to offer increasingly more innovative ways to improve safety and protect schools, we’ll see those technologies become more integrated. For example, the ability to bring together weapons screening systems, artificial intelligence, cameras, automated locks, and mass notification systems will help identify and address threats sooner. Having some or all of these systems in place helps reduce anxiety and allows everybody to stay focused on learning.

You can read the first article in the series, “How to Engage and Include Students in School Safety,” here.

How the Threat of Gun Violence Will Change in 2023: Experts Share Their Predictions

If it seems like every time you turn on the news there’s another story about a mass shooting, that’s because it continues to happen. It comes as no surprise that gun-related deaths have been on the rise in recent years. The U.S. experienced more than 600 mass shootings in 2022, nearly double the number recorded four years ago when there were 335, according to the Gun Violence Archive

The victims are our children, colleagues, friends and neighbors. They are randomly killed while grocery shopping, working, and attending parades. Others are the targets of hate crimes against historically marginalized communities. Nobody is immune from the gun violence epidemic.

As 2023 gets underway with more than thoughts and prayers for the millions of people affected by gun violence, we asked industry experts to share their recommendations for a better, safer future – one where we can gather publicly without fear and anxiety that our time may be cut short due to a senseless act of gun violence.

Our expert panel consists of:

  • Jill Lemond, director of education at Evolv
  • John Pistole, former United States Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
  • Bilal Zuberi, general partner at Lux Capital

We know it is difficult to explore this topic, but the gun violence epidemic cannot be ignored. We came away from our conversations with more than hope – our experts offer specific insights and actions we can all take to stem the violence. We welcome additional thoughts from the community and encourage you to reach out with your ideas.  

Prediction #1: Schools and communities will work more closely together to improve school safety, and public safety as a whole, using a holistic approach that integrates people, processes and technology.

The rise in school shootings will result in schools and communities working more closely together on school safety planning. According to Jill Lemond, “Parents are getting more involved, there are greater efforts to incorporate the mental health needs of students, and there are fantastic technology solutions to help address the mental health and the physical security needs of schools. We’ll continue to see schools and communities working more closely together along with a continued demand by parents to install weapons detection systems in schools.”

As schools and communities work more closely together, John Pistole offers this advice on ways to help prevent school shootings.

“There are three actions school administrators and school boards can take. First is recognizing that there is a gun violence issue in this country. Second is to mitigate the risk of a school shooting. This may include increasing the presence of physical security with off duty police officers or school resource officers, combined with more advanced locks and access control systems. The third part is taking action. For example, there are still some COVID-19 relief funds available that are designed for public health. With their fairly broad limitations, those funds can be used as part of the actions to increase school safety.”

According to security expert Juliette Kayyem, schools will always be vulnerable and new perspectives are needed. “In that regard, there must be more focus on the duty of parents [and caregivers] in terms of practicing responsible gun ownership and I think we’ll see more of that in the future. I can also imagine changes to the guiding principle of ‘run, hide, fight’ when it comes to security and mass shootings.

Running is preferred; hiding if it is the only response possible; fighting if there is no other choice. Since no active shooter situation is the same, this isn’t a hard-and-fast rule. If we are to be guided by facts, and consider our safety training based on the available evidence, then we need to further assess whether, in an age when so much damage can be done so quickly by guns that should not be on the street, “Run, hide, fight” is still the correct public messaging. With killers having the capacity to end the lives of so many people so fast, neither running nor hiding may be the best first option. I’m now asking myself whether we in the U.S. have been too dismissive about fighting back. I’m not ready to say I want my young kids to fight if, God forbid, they encounter a mass shooter. But I’m willing to admit that maybe I want someone present to fight for them.”

Zuberi anticipates more investments in physical security being reviewed by non-security executives. He said, “More business leaders, board members and other stakeholders are getting involved in selecting physical security systems and this will continue throughout 2023. The change happened as security was dealing with staff turnover and outdated metal detectors, and business leaders and other stakeholders outside of security wanted to improve the customer experience.”

“There are two axes to consider when it comes to security. The first is the number of people exposed to a potential threat and the economic impact of an incident. For example, think about where most people congregate; it’s festivals, fairs, concerts, etc. We’ll see more security investments around those venues.

The other axis is the economic impact of a death or shooting incident. For example, the impact of a targeted shooting in a nightclub is horrible, but the economic impact is relatively low compared to a random shooting at work or a supermarket. Those incidents lead to more widespread fear and terror that rips through society, therefore having a greater economic impact.”

“Because of these factors, we’re starting to see companies, hospitals and large buildings with lots of activity and people invest more in security. We’ll continue to see schools invest in security technology.”

Prediction #2: We will see improvements to some, but not all, of the biggest threats to public safety.

We asked the experts about the biggest threats to public safety and what they believe can and should be done to address those vulnerabilities. The biggest areas of vulnerability are schools and select public venues.

Schools

According to Lemond, “The biggest threat facing school administrators is having to do more with less. A big part of an administrator’s role requires finding qualified professional staff to serve the needs of the school and the community while keeping students safe in school. Right now, it feels like they’re tasked with the impossible as mental health issues are on the rise and fewer teachers and administrators enter the profession. I predict we’ll see some improvements when it comes to addressing the needs of administrators, especially as hiring gaps become even greater, having a ripple effect on students and ultimately school safety.” 

In terms of the rise of swatting, Lemond believes, “Swatting will continue until there is a unified approach to the consequences. However, more states are enacting stricter laws around it and this is resulting in fewer hoaxes. Once other students see that false alarms are resulting in felony prosecutions, the swatting calls will decrease.”

Public venues that support progressive or diverse communities

“As we look at the rise in gun violence, one area of great concern are public places and events that support progressive or diverse communities. In particular, LGBTQ+ events and clubs. Equally at risk are synagogues due to the rise in antisemitism that’s being nurtured and amplified on social media platforms that neglect content moderation. While antisemitism is largely shamed, there seems to be a willingness in our society to explore the justifications for shootings in the LGBTQ+ community. We all need to be more cognizant of what is happening around us and continue to enforce the law to protect our most vulnerable populations,” said Kayyem.

From Zuberi’s perspective, “In 2023, expect more businesses to respond to the transition in physical security as it goes from being a services business to a technology business. Right now, there’s an existential crisis that is fundamentally changing how business owners view security in their establishments. They’re realizing that it’s not enough to install just any type of security system. They also know their businesses may not exist if a tragedy such as a shooting were to happen onsite as potential customers feel unsafe and stop coming and potential employees don’t want to work there. We’ve seen this play out in other parts of the world as suicide bombers and rioters attack public venues. They’re more likely to attack American chain hotels and restaurants and we know that after an attack, customers are less likely to go to those places.

In 2023, I expect investments in security technology will increase. Specifically, in-network connected, distributed sensors that are used by best-on-class leaders to allow us to more quickly and cost effectively detect threats to human security and intervene. Much like cybersecurity has become part of our everyday lives, so will physical security.” 

Prediction #3: Unfortunately, we will see a greater number of tragedies become more complex due to cyber threats and ineffective incident response.

“I think we are unfortunately going to see more shootings and one of my biggest concerns is that we’ll see a physical attack combined with a cyberattack,” said Pistole.

“A recipe for disaster is brewing due to a lack of consistent enforcement of red flag laws and suspicions about the actions law enforcement took in Uvalde. No matter how much you regulate and write new laws to protect people, they need to be enforced. One of my biggest concerns is that parents will hear about an active shooter incident, whether it’s real or a hoax, and run into the schools because they don’t trust law enforcement,” said Kayyem.

From Zuberi’s point of view, “While there will likely be more incidents, what is changing is that physical security and safety is becoming more part of our everyday life and more personal. We saw this change with the COVID-19 pandemic as people realized that their physical safety was in danger depending on where they went.

“For so long, when we went to stadiums or concerts, we thought someone else was taking care of security. While this is true, we are still seeing incidents like in Las Vegas where a bad actor got through. Along with security shifting from a service to technology, what’s also changing is that people are doing more to protect their own physical safety. Just like Moms Demand Action started the day after the Sandy Hook tragedy, we see more people using their voice to influence change.”

“I have a request that I hope becomes a reality in the future. It’s that the media stop publicizing the names of school shooters and giving attention to the crisis. If school shooters didn’t get so much attention in the news, shootings may not happen as much. Instead of focusing on the shooting, the media should focus on how families and communities can heal. After a school shooting, so many people ask how they can help. There are many ways the public can help such as donating to resiliency centers that are set up in the cities and towns where mass shootings have occurred. The media can play a better role in highlighting what the public can do and bring greater awareness to the mental health resources that are available,” said Lemond.

 

School Safety Part 1: Inviting Student Voices into the Safety Planning Process

Band, student government, chess club, and athletics. These are some typical activities and student groups you see when you thumb through the class photos of any high school yearbook. Yet, seldom do schools create a student safety committee. This type of group can and should exist as an integral part of district safety planning. Student voices must be invited into the school security conversation as one of the most valuable perspectives on the topic.

Gun violence, especially when it occurs in schools, is never an easy topic to discuss. With gun violence continuing to escalate, Americans are rightfully concerned. One in five believe their chance of encountering an active shooter has increased since 2019, according to a recent survey. The difficult conversations need to happen if we want to decrease, and ultimately try to put an end to, gun violence in schools.

It’s hard to ignore the fact that more than 900 school shootings have taken place in this country since the Sandy Hook tragedy in December 2012; not to mention the 27 school shootings that occurred in 2022. As students continue to speak out as agents for change, it’s also hard to ignore the insights of students when it comes to creating safer school environments.

We sat down for a Q&A with Jill Lemond, Evolv’s Director of Education, to discuss the importance of inviting student voices into the safety planning process. Prior to joining Evolv, Jill spent 12 years as the assistant superintendent of safety and school operations at Oxford Community Schools in Oxford, Michigan where she learned, firsthand, of the tragic effects of school gun violence.

Q. Are students ever involved in school safety decisions?

A. Students are not typically included in school safety decisions because there is not a natural or obvious channel for them to enter the safety planning process. Many times, adults think they know better, but the reality is schools exist for the students and students should have a voice when it comes to safety. Certainly, students do not have the same experience, knowledge, and decision-making authority as say the superintendent or safety officer. However, they do have insight into what is happening with their peers in school and online and have the pulse of the building. Such student insight fills an intelligence gap that could potentially stop an incident.

Q. Wouldn’t including students in school safety increase their fear and anxiety?

A. It may seem counterintuitive to involve students in the school safety process since we are ultimately trying to protect our children. However, young adults today are already inundated with media and messages, sometimes erroneous ones, about school gun violence. They are acutely aware of the dangers of school shootings. Including students in the safety planning process empowers them and can actually help decrease their anxiety around gun violence. Also, when students have agency about what happens in their school, they are more connected to the building and community, making them more likely to make safety a priority and feel comfortable reporting potentially dangerous behavior.

Q. What types of safety programs can students get involved in that will make a difference in keeping everybody in school safe?

A. There are lots of ways that school administrators and faculty can include students – actively or anonymously – to improve safety.

Every time we were considering a new security technology in Oxford, we asked our key stakeholders to weigh in on the decision. This advisory group included local police, fire, superintendents and administrators, parents, and the community, among others. It is important

to include these participants, especially parents, to inform them of every decision and to alleviate any concerns about students being involved in the process. As a school is narrowing its decision, they can invite students to participate.

For example, a pilot of the Evolv Express system presents a great opportunity for students to try it out and participate in a poll about their experience. Another thought, with a system like Evolv, schools can get students even more involved by creating a contest for students to design what image should be on the panels of the system.

Also, for better or worse, social media continues to play a large role in many students’ lives. Meanwhile, there are not a lot of options for adults with good intentions to monitor what’s happening online. Schools can create pathways for students to anonymously report what they’re hearing or seeing from their peers on social media, and in the real world, as it pertains to safety concerns. Of course, there’s always the potential for incident reports that are not genuine threats. But if we can foster stronger relationships with students and give them the tools to communicate with adults, we can potentially decrease school gun violence.

Another benefit of including students in the safety planning process is that it helps them see law enforcement in a more positive way. They realize that police and other authority figures are not people to keep secrets from rather people our students can trust. They build relationships with other adults on the safety committee and have a variety of trusted advocates in the school community to share with any concerning information or threats.

Q. What resources should schools have in place to help prevent gun violence?

A. I think the best approach includes a balance of both technology and non-tech resources. From a tech point of view, there are anonymous reporting tools, software to scan school-issued accounts and flag potential issues, and advanced weapons screening systems like Evolv Express®.

From a non-tech point of view, it really comes down to establishing genuine relationships and trust with students. When a student trusts an adult in the building, they are less likely to commit an act of violence. They also feel more comfortable reporting anything that might indicate safety risks to other students. Additionally, students should have a way to self-report if they are at risk.

The sad truth is that if someone is intent on hurting people, they will find a way to do so. In my opinion, one of the most important ways to try to stop school shootings is to create an environment where all students feel seen, heard, valued, and respected. Too often, a small percentage of the student body is overlooked or ignored. If we can identify those students, reach out to them and make them feel welcome and included, it could make a big difference. This cannot be achieved during a singular event or activity; this requires an entire culture of intentional inclusion with zero tolerance for bullying or other harmful behaviors in the school environment.

Q. In your experience, what do students want when it comes to safety and security at school?

A. While students should play an active role in safety decisions if they choose, they should not be burdened with thinking about security all the time. That’s the role of adults. Students want to have fun, to explore, to learn, and to grow. Students want to know that they are valued and that school leadership is prioritizing the safety of their learning environment. Let’s allow them to focus on their education without the constant fear and anxiety of school violence on their minds. Our students deserve peace of mind so they are free to learn an instrument, run for student council, master chess and most importantly, have a yearbook filled with happy memories they can look back on in the years to come.

Keeping Cities Safe: Part 1

How Innovative Cities Are Combatting Gun Violence Where We Live, Work, Learn, and Play 

Citizens Are Concerned—Everywhere 

Today, violent gun crimes are happening everywhere: in schools, malls, grocery stores, even city parades.  Gun violence in the U.S. has surged in the last few years, with 2020 and 2021 marking some of the deadliest years on record. It is no wonder that as many as eight in 10 Americans rate violent crime as a leading issue in the U.S.  

Sobering metrics:

  • In 2020, homicides increased across U.S. cities overall, with murders increasing by 33 percent and gun homicides by 37 percent compared to 2019, the largest single-year increase in more than a century, according to data published by the FBI.   

“This widespread rise [in gun violence] is affecting small and large cities—and blue and red cities and states alike. The seemingly dispersed nature of this rise is fueling fear nationwide.” – Brookings, April 2022  

What is causing this explosion in city and gun violence and its impact on our way of life? Most critically, how can we take proactive steps to fight this growing national epidemic? 

This five-part blog series will take this topic head on—offering actionable and proactive solutions from some of the most forward-thinking and innovative mayoral offices, law enforcement agencies, and security experts in cities across the U.S. These cities are watching their crime and gun violence statistics improve by focusing their efforts on layered security strategies. These initiatives include strengthening the capabilities and processes used by those who manage venue and event security as well as deploying the right technology to help mitigate today’s threats.

Today, public and private organizations in cities of all sizes are not OK with the status quo. Not on our watch. Not when mass shootings are happening where we live, work, learn, and play. We can do something about it.  What compelled me to co-found Evolv Technology nine years ago—the desire to help create weapons-free zones—is needed now more than ever as we battle this growing national epidemic.        

First, how did we get here?

The U.S., like many countries, has always dealt with gun violence issues. The combination of many more guns (both legal and illegal) on the streets, an increased willingness to use them to settle disputes, and a noticeable increase in societal polarization and anxiety—all have contributed to an environment of heightened gun violence. Everyone agrees that gun violence is an incredibly complex issue, one that’s plagued our nation for decades.

As a group of informed and concerned experts working to reduce gun violence, we’ll continue to factor in the contributors to this violence. At the same time, we’ll push forward to implement the systems and processes, people-engagement and training, and state-of-the-art technologies that are working right now to reduce gun violence. The bottom line is that all of us want to feel safer than we do right now. This is achievable. The debate can rage on—but we are moving forward to take our cities back.     

These cities activated solutions that work 

Our series covers best practices across four major U.S. cities, each with a focus on how they are addressing gun violence creatively, innovatively, and—most importantly—in partnership with public and private organizations in a way that is delivering real results.  

  • Detroit, Michigan: Reducing gun violence where we live  
  • New York, NY: Reducing gun violence where we work   
  • Guildford, North Carolina: Reducing gun violence where we learn 
  • Atlanta, Georgia: Reducing gun violence where we play

Making everywhere safer

The actions we are taking today can save lives. Regardless of the outcome of federal and state mental health and gun safety initiatives, I’ve never seen a more inspiring and focused assembly of national (even global) security experts, local law enforcement, and mayoral offices diving into partner against gun violence. These practical solutions all have a specific, common denominator: the strengthening of people, processes, and technology.

Join us in the weeks ahead as this 5-part blog series highlights steps any city can take to do the right thing by its citizens.

Creating Peace of Mind for NFL Tailgaters

The NFL season begins tonight with a much-anticipated matchup between the Bills and the Rams, followed on Sunday by a full slate of games. Over the next 72 hours, people all around the NFL will be finalizing months of preparation, double-checking equipment, and making last minute adjustments in the hopes of successful start to the season. Oh, and the players will also be getting ready to play.

The people I am referring to are every bit as important to the NFL as the players themselves … the tailgaters. Tailgating is an essential part of the NFL experience, consistently topping fan satisfaction surveys and creating an entire subculture of bbq rigs, secret recipes, and fan rituals. Just like players and coaches, devoted tailgaters spend hours preparing for gameday and know they have to deliver under pressure.

As central as tailgating is to NFL teams, it also creates a significant operational challenge for them. Simply put, tailgating is so fun and compelling that many fans don’t want to leave the parking lots until the very last minute. This, in turn, tends to create a crunch at the stadium gates, as thousands of fans try to clear entry screening before kickoff. Even if they make it in time – and many do not – this process is stressful and bursts the bubble of good feeling that tailgating created. Not an ideal way to welcome a fan to the game, to say the least.

While this experience will play out across the NFL this weekend, it won’t happen everywhere. That’s because an increasing number of NFL teams and stadiums are deploying Evolv Express, our next-gen entry screening platform. With Express, entry lines are all but eliminated – even when hordes of tailgaters seemingly arrive at the gates all at once minutes before kickoff. The lines melt away because Express offers throughput rates up to ten times faster than legacy systems, and because fans are not required to perform the time-consuming removal of personal items from their pockets and bags. Four of Evolv’s NFL clients – the Chargers, Falcons, Rams, and Titans – host their home openers this weekend, and the other four – the Browns, Eagles, Patriots, and Steelers – open at home next weekend.

These eight NFL teams have installed Evolv Express because they are committed to delivering the best possible experience for all their fans, even those who like to get to their seat just in the nick of time. And, just as importantly, because they are also committed to delivering the best possible fan safety and security. That’s really the trick Express pulls off: no lines and no reduction in security effectiveness. In fact, Express is the only next-gen screening platform available today with a Dept. of Homeland Security SAFETY Act designation for security effectiveness. At Evolv, we’re on a mission to transform security to enhance everyone’s life. We believe that everyone deserves the peace of mind of knowing they are in a weapons-free zone. And when we can do that in way that also means a dedicated tailgater can get to his or her seat just in time for kickoff, all the better!

Good luck to our NFL clients and all NFL teams this season.

Evolv Express systems are currently used by NFL, MLB and MLS franchises across the country, including by nine NFL teams. Heading to a game this season? We’d love to see how you experience Evolv. Tag @EvolvTechnology on Twitter.

Q&A: A Former Police Officer and School Principal Offers Back-To-School Safety Advice

A hint of cooling weather, pre-season games and teacher wish lists posted online are a few of the telltale signs that a new school year is upon us. More subtle signs are the increased anxiety among students, parents, teachers and administrators due to the rise in gun violence. In fact, this past year, the CDC reported that firearms are now the leading cause of death among young people.

Taking a closer look at the school gun violence issue and what can be done to lower the risk, we spoke with Kevin Eberle, EdD. A former police officer that received FBI and Secret Service protection training, Kevin also spent 27 years as a school principal. He earned an EdD in Educational Leadership and Administration from the University of Buffalo and is highly skilled in lesson planning, educational technology, trauma-informed care and emergency response to critical situations in school environments.

Can you tell us how you went from being a police officer to a school principal?

I began my career as a police officer in Virginia with the goal of becoming an FBI agent. I was later promoted to one of the two Tactical Teams (SWAT) and started training with the Secret Service in Dignitary Protection to support the President of the United States as he flew into our city for summits with heads of state. With the FBI, I went to Sniper School. Over time, every tactical officer was assigned to training new recruits in the Police Academy. This was a turning point in my career as I discovered how much I loved teaching and passing my skills on to the next group of recruits.

After seven years in the police department, I had an opportunity to develop a new criminal justice curriculum for the State of New York and began teaching Criminal Justice to high school juniors and seniors. From there, I eventually became a school principal. Yet throughout my career in education, I kept my police and tactical mindset at the forefront as being responsible for hundreds of teacher and thousands of students requires safety to be the number one priority.

Today, as a retired educator and former police officer, I am now an education and school safety consultant continuing my life’s mission to keep students and teachers safe. In this role, I complement my law enforcement and educational training by focusing on the social and emotional factors that impact the school day, bringing forth a focus on safety, security and mental health.

What do you see are the biggest contributing factors to the increase in violence in schools?

There are several factors contributing to the increase in school violence, and I’ll touch upon five of the most critical ones. The first is the changing structure of today’s society as multiple factors influence students and their exposure to violence. The second is legislative changes on bail reform. For example, a student may commit a crime at night and be released and return to school the next day bringing the previous night’s anxiety and attitudes with them, which can permeate the school. Third is increasing mental health issues as suicide rates and domestic violence continue to rise. Fourth is teacher retention and experience managing behaviors related to mental health. While Trauma Informed Care and Restorative Practice are two major initiatives for teacher professional development, many schools have not yet engaged these practices. Fifth, there is minimal accountability for bad student behavior. Many schools isolate students with poor behavior, suspending them every time they act out instead of assisting them to better manage their actions.

In addition to the use of Evolv, what other initiatives do you recommend schools consider to enhance safety?

So much of school safety is rooted in the way the day starts. You really don’t know how the night before went for a student. They may be carrying over family issues, gang activities or cyberbullying, for example. Adults must be trained to recognize these signs with each student. When you have Evolv Express® in place, it allows adults to engage every student at the door with a positive, proactive greeting to start the day while also sending a clear message that safety and security are the number one priority, and weapons are not allowed. While Evolv Express is a game changer, the human factor must also be embedded into the overall strategy for school safety. This is why in addition to Evolv, schools need to enhance safety with professional development including relationship building, trauma-informed care and collaborative efforts so they can bring restorative practices into focus.

If you could say one thing to a school decision maker who is on the fence about partnering with Evolv, what would it be?

Evolv Express is not the complete answer for keeping schools safe, but it truly develops and creates a safer atmosphere. As educators, we call this our “participatory set,” establishing the tone of every lesson in the classroom. Combining the human factor with Evolv Express reduces anxiety, depression and the fear that many students and teachers have every day about the rise of gun violence in schools.

Responsible Security and Public Transparency

When developing and selling technology intended to keep catastrophic events from happening, you have a responsibility to your customers, partners, employees and all the people your customers intend to keep out of harm’s way. 

At Evolv, we have such a responsibility, and we take it very seriously. Our founder Mike Ellenbogen has spent over two decades innovating and developing airport security technology that is still in use today. He and co-founder Anil Chitkara launched Evolv after Anil’s wife narrowly missed the Boston Marathon bombing. 

I, on the other hand, have marketed technology my entire career looking to do good in the world, build an enduring company that will last well beyond my years, and work with people I respect and admire. Along came Evolv. I bought in from the beginning. I admire every single person I work with and the customers we serve. Hearts full, they have the boldness of character to drive our mission, which is to make the world a safer place. Period. And we’re doing it in partnership with the truly incredible security experts that I have met along the way, prospective customers, our esteemed advisors and security partners. Our team is comprised of established industry experts and advisors, including leaders in aviation security, national intelligence, Department of Homeland Security, FBI and TSA, who have dedicated their careers to keeping people safe from harm. 

Of debate in this new world is what information we should share about our technology. What information should the public know about the technology our customers are deploying, and how can we be fully transparent with the security experts piloting our system? As we’ve learned from the TSA, revealing too much information only helps the bad guys. On Christmas day 2009, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab flew from Brussels to Detroit with a non-metallic IED hidden in his underwear. He knew in advance that there was no detection for non-metallic bombs in most airport security protocols and regimens in use at the time. We know this because upon investigation, this vulnerability was discovered through extensive online research, and multiple scouting missions to probe and test for vulnerabilities at specific facilities using specific screening methods. This is a frightening reality. As AI-based weapons screening technology is new to many venues, we need to develop standards, in conjunction with industry experts and trusted security professionals, on the transparency of sensitive security to the general public. 

After careful review, as a company, we have taken a stance on information sharing starting with the NCS4 report on Evolv. We provide a public and private version. Our team feels strongly that we should disclose sensitive information only to trusted security professionals intending to purchase or sell our system – under NDA.  To ensure we are on the right track, we surveyed our customers. Results were as follows:

  • 96% of respondents said the public should not have access to any information that encompasses detection technology performance.
  • 100% of respondents said the public should not have access to information about detection technology sensitivity settings and the items that alert–and do not alert–at each sensitivity setting.
  • 100% of respondents said the public should not have access to specific recommendations that Evolv provides for configuring and deploying Evolv Express system in their environment.

The open comments section of the survey provided some additional insight into the sentiments behind the numbers, and further solidified our stance:

“The less that is shared with (the public) the better chance we all have at someone not finding a weak point.”

“Any and all data concerning procedural or practical utilization of the security equipment should be scrubbed from public consumption.”

“These systems should (be) transparent only to the point of how the customer needs to walk through the system. All other sensitive points need to be closely held.”

“We keep all our data private and only release it to our team that has a need to know.”

“I believe that Evolv shares appropriately to ensure that there are no misgivings on what the system does and does not do in general terms. With customers, or potential customers, after execution of mutual NDAs, not unlike any other system or product, the expectation is that Evolv is transparent about capabilities and limitations of the system so that the customer is ‘eyes wide open’.”

We feel we are moving in the right direction. That said, this isn’t enough. We – the courageous people charged with keeping people safe – need to work together to develop and set standards for security technology meant to keep weapons from entering the places we hold dear. Our public safety responsibility requires a delicate balance of maintaining transparency to the community at large, while keeping sensitive security information out of the hands of adversaries. If you share our mission, please join us in developing best practices and setting standards for sharing security information to the general public.  Please email:  Transparency@EvolvTechnology.com 

Transparency sits on a spectrum

Juliette Kayyem is former Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental Affairs at the Department of Homeland Security and an Evolv Technology Advisor

On the surface, we hear the word “transparency” and think it’s all-around a good thing, and something to expect from businesses, our government and the technology we use. But, in most cases, transparency is a spectrum, not all or none. We have a tendency to think of things as an on/off switch – either it’s transparent or secure – which doesn’t fit the complex and complicated world in which we live today. The best technology is transparent as to what it does without disclosing a “blueprint” to an enemy or releasing private information that shouldn’t be.

My perspective from having been in security for many years is not to ask whether something is transparent; rather, ask what rules, processes, and best practices are in place that can help guide the deployment of technology. For example, in some situations, that might be displaying signage disclosing to people that they are walking through detection technology designed to find weapons.

We need to judge the framework guiding transparency 

Today, we all live a bit in the “in between,” where there’s a big space between something being unlawful or violent and disclosure. Some information, like a breach of medical information, can be damaging or harmful to a person’s reputation, but doesn’t risk physical harm. Other information, like how to “trick” or get around security – like we’ve seen in hundreds of movies – can lead to real, physical harm to one or many people. Our job as security professionals is to identify our goal(s) for deploying processes and technology, the risks of those failing and our audience’s expectations for transparency – and find the place at the center where all of those can coexist.

Choices about transparency, security and “everyday life” are everywhere

Today’s threat environment means Americans are having to constantly make choices about how much transparency we – both as individuals and collectively as a society – require, and what we’re willing to live with in order to go about our lives. For example, when visiting a theme park, you may be aware of the screening technology you walk through to enter, but may not be aware of the videos and plain-clothed security professionals positioned throughout the park. Most of us are willing to visit the park for the experience it provides and to spend quality time with our families and friends, despite not knowing its exact security protocols. We trust the organization to share the information they feel won’t risk our security, and keep the rest from getting into the wrong hands.

In other words, we know there is a trade-off because we understand that security is complicated; there are multiple layers in place in order to prevent someone with bad intentions from getting access. And security measures are not just at the physical entrance, they begin with restricting access to information that can help bad actors navigate around – and through – those layers.

Expectations, like transparency, exist on a spectrum

When I’m in my own home, my expectations for privacy are greater than they are when I’m out at a big public event. (Although, even those expectations are shifting with the ubiquity of connected devices – speakers, refrigerators, thermostats, etc.) When I’m attending, say, a sporting event, my expectation for privacy shifts; I recognize that, for the safety and security of the crowd, I will be subject to things like screenings, security reviews and surveillance. And, in practice, most people will go through those crowds anonymously – until they bring a gun or weapon that is prohibited, and they/the risk is handled per the venue’s security protocols.

The reality is, just like everything, transparency isn’t black or white. While it’s easy to say something violates or doesn’t violate transparency, it is not as simple as that. In order to live in a society where we can gather together – at a concert, a football game, a museum – we all make trade-offs to ensure our own safety and security, as well as that of those with whom we gather. So, every time we rush to judgment on whether or not something is transparent, we need to stop and consider the overall framework, security risks and responsibility involved in making decisions about an individual’s – or large group’s – safety.

To read more about Juliette, visit her LinkedIn; follow her on Twitter or find her latest book, The Devil Never Sleeps, on Amazon